Page 93 - Ickford NP Consultation Report

ICKFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT : VISION FOR ICKFORD 93

Table Two continued

Responder Comment INP Reference Comment Response Change
Number Number Page Policy Para Required

2 15 9.1 VALP not an accepted document at present. VALP is the best No
Where do we put inûll? Surely this will have an indication we have and is
eect on the much prized visual street line. therefore acceptable for
inclusion in the INP.
2 16 9.1 Where do we put infill? Surely this will have an Could perhaps replace Possibly
effect on the much prized visual street line. “Infilling of 1 or 2 houses
will be appropriate…”
with “Infilling of 1 or 2
houses could be
acceptable..”
2 17 9.2 Surely once houses have been accepted as Don’t understand this No
agricultural dwellings we leave a gap for inûlling. comment. Infilling not
appicable to agricultural
dwellings.

2 18 9.5 These larger developments. The last was almost The INP accepts the No
25 years ago and has been assimilated into the current VALP allotment
village. Surely it’s time to try again? of 20 houses.

2 19 ND2 As well as design surely we should be thinking Current planning and No
about incorporating eco friendly measures into building regulations
any new construction. I.e. ground pumps, brown should incorporate a
recycled water,solar panels etc. certain amount of “eco
friendly” measures.
Anymore than this could
increase costs and make
houses even more
unaffordable.
2 20 ND3 Is there proof we need more allotments? The current allotments Check?
appear to be well used
but we should perhaps
check if there is a waiting
list. Occupiers of small
affordable homes are
more likely to take
advantage of allotments.

2 21 ND4 You need to be on the housing waiting list to get Good point - we perhaps Consider
an aordable home. need to alter the wording change
– do we really mean
“affordable” in the
technical sense.

2 22 TT1 More enforcement limiting the ability of large Difficult other than No
vehicles to access the village. weight limits on the
bridges.

2 23 10.4 No school bus to Lord Williams Check and delete. Yes

2 24 10.5 12 years, surely an acceptable frequency. Para. 10.5 says e.g 2007 No
– there have been
problems since then. The
village is vulnerable to
global warming and what
happens in the Thame
Valley, due to the village’s
high water table, and
indeed the River Thames
itself.

VISION FOR ICKFORD – NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
www.visionforickford.co.uk