Page 107 - Ickford NP Consultation Report

ICKFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT : VISION FOR ICKFORD 107

Table Three continued

Responder Comment INP Reference Comment Response Change
Number Number Page Policy Para Required
11 37 39 Annex 3 The discrepancy between ‘views’ and ‘key views’ Agreed Change
should be resolved plan
11 38 42 Annex 5 Any additionally defined terms should be Agreed Change
included in an updated glossary. Flood Risk plan
should differentiate between Flood Zones (river
flooding) and other sources.

Table B. comments on the Background Evidence Report:

Responder Comment INP Reference Comment Response Change
Number Number Page Policy Para Required
General There are a number of strong statements and The evidence report will be Changes
positions set out in the evidence report and in revisited. However, the made
some instances seems to go further than the draft evidence base may refer to
plan and policies as to how sustainable the evidence collected by the
development can be achieved in the parish. It Np team which does not
might be beneficial to review the statements in translate into a specific policy
both to ensure the evidence supports and matches in the Np, sometimes due to
the proposed policies. the difficulties in collecting
robust evidence, sometimes
because the issues are not
strictly land use based. The
Np has sought to reflect the
key issues identified in the
background report as far as
possible. A sentence has been
added to the introduction to
explain this.

5 Introduction ‘How the Neighbourhood Plan fits within the Amended
Local Plan’ lines 14-16. This needs changing to
say “In summer 2016, a Draft Plan was published
and in Autumn 2017, the Proposed Submission
Draft was published. The Plan was submitted for
Examination in February 2018 and Examination
Hearings took place in July 2018.
7 Table The NPPF should say (2019) version Agreed

9 Table The VALP covers the period 2013-2033 . The Agreed
Aylesbury Vale Green Infrastructure Strategy was
published in 2011.. Aylesbury Vale HELAA v4
was produced in 2017.
7 Table The NPPF should say (2019) version Agreed
13 Box 3 The risk (severity and likelihood) of flooding is Reference included
expected to increase rather than ‘might’ – details of
the projected changes under different scenarios is
available in EA guidance on flood risk allowances.
14, 15 Key Reference to the need for SuDS should be aligned Reference included
water with NPPF para 163 in that development should
issues not increase flood risk elsewhere. Similarly
for conventional SuDS may not be appropriate due to
Ickford the hydrogeological characteristics of the parish.
The evidence document could include further
detail of groundwater and surface water flood
risk including maps.

VISION FOR ICKFORD – NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
www.visionforickford.co.uk